Why ‘Star Trek’ endures and what ‘Discovery’ needs to remember

'Kirk & Spock' by JD Hancock / CC
'Kirk & Spock' by JD Hancock / CC

For many people who grew up watching Star Trek, it was as much a formative influence as any sermon or religious text. Even now, it still has a timeless quality which has made it a perennial fixture on every entertainment medium over the last five decades, and for good reason.

With another blockbuster film success in Star Trek Beyond and a new series titled ‘Discovery’ on the horizon for 2017, few would say that after 50 years Star Trek‘s future is looking bleak. Yet, what is the source of Trek‘s enduring popularity? Is it as simple as an original idea taking hold in the public consciousness, or is there more to it?

Look at the original Star Trek television series (latterly referred to as The Original Series or TOS): It has passed into such a dominant position in the cultural lexicon that Captain Kirk (William Shatner), Mr Spock (Leonard Nimoy), Dr McCoy (DeForst Kelly) and the Enterprise itself sit next to Superman, Batman, Coca-Cola and Jesus as being instantly recognisable. You would be hard pressed to find anyone that could not name an associated character, gimmick or feature of the show. It has traversed time as its characters do space to ensure that even the most reluctant science-fiction fan can name some details about it as sure as the most ardent misanthrope can tell you about the Kardashians.

The love from fans is often accredited to the novelty of the production (recently edited into high-definition and reformatted with new CGI) in the same way as plastic monsters and poor sets are with Doctor Who. Channel 4’s Countdown or even Jeremy Clarkson’s Top Gear often wear ‘ambitiose sed ineptum’ as a badge of honour. It’s a peculiarly British quality to adore that which tries to be magnificent but struggles, but Star Trek, with its iconic moments, literally shaking sets and Kirk’s legendary lechery, is much more than a dated TV show.

Trek, in all its forms, succeeds best when it surreptitiously challenges us to face the human condition head-on. The setting may well be the future, starships and new worlds, but the ageless consideration of what it means to be ontologically, teleologically and morally human overshadows any anachronistic production value.

Consider Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (DS9). Released in 1993, it ran for seven seasons and focussed on a stationary space station and took what is widely considered to be a ‘darker’ route than the previous incarnations of TOS and Star Trek: The Next Generation (TNG). For this reason, it has a complicated love affair with fans: some adore it precisely because it is different, others call it a black sheep amongst the vista of optimism that Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry envisioned.

DS9, however, is arguably the truest Trek to Roddenberry’s vision. If Star Trek is about embracing the human condition, then DS9 is the human condition in motion. TOS and TNG are magnificent productions of intelligence that, on a weekly basis, have their crews encounter new worlds and new cultures which pose an anthropological challenge or a threat which must be dealt with. Often episodes focus on the characters themselves and their quest to overcome what Marx referred to as ‘alienation’, or the separation of humanity from mechanised labour.

Yet, compared to DS9 these are largely consequence-free environments. Decisions and discussions rarely resonate to create emotional and character season-arcs. The episodic structure of The Original Series and The Next Generation is what has largely driven them to be the most successfully syndicated programmes of all time. DS9, on the other hand, thrives precisely because characterisation is cumulative and developmental rather than episodic. Conflict is rife, as the critics rightly say, but so is friendship, exploration, action and diplomacy all while tackling the epistemological, moral and ethical issues which made previous shows memorable and original.

The Next Generation much preferred high impact episodes to recurring plot points. Lieutenant Commander Data’s (Brent Spiner) bid to become more human, the aftermath of Captain Picard’s (Patrick Stewart) experiences with the Borg (the fallout from the show-defining episode ‘Best of Both Worlds’) and Commander Riker’s (Jonathan Frakes) career plans are the only, occasionally referenced, character threads. The show’s brilliance, by contrast, rested exclusively with its ability to make a lasting impact. ‘The Measure Of A Man’ focussed entirely on the courtroom drama of proving the sentience and rights of the android Data; the two-part episode ‘Chain of Command’ unapologetically portrayed the barbarity and futility in the torture of Picard (11 years before the War on Terror popularised the subject matter); ‘Darmok’ pits the captain against an incommunicable alien who can only speak in historic metaphor and ‘The Neutral Zone’ is a high-stakes game of diplomatic guile and bluff with the Romulans concluded without a shot being fired. “These are the voyages of the starship Enterprise” is literally that, with seldom a hark back to what developments have come before.

Deep Space Nine, by comparison, took the main cast members and guest stars and gave them an evolving, knock on story-arc. Commander, later Captain, Sisko’s (Avery Brooks) recovery from the loss of his wife transforms him from a macabre character into a joyous explorer, rounded by his friends and family but tempered and mellowed by war. He has a breakdown after the death of his friend Jadzia Dax (Terry Farrell), he lies out of pragmatism, he has a temper, obsessive tendencies and he makes mistakes but is easily the most human of the Starfleet captains portrayed on-screen. Sisko’s journey from single-parent to religious emissary takes him down a myriad of paths and encounters with fellow characters, not least his son Jake (Cirroc Lofton), which concludes with a remarried war hero and religious martyr who you can believe has taken a journey of seven years.

Character developments and story arcs are not restricted to cast members: The spy-turned-tailor, Garak’s (Andrew Robinson) murky past and his burgeoning friendship with Dr Bashir (Alexander Siddig); the cultural conflicts between Jake Sisko and the Ferengi Nog (Aron Eisenberg) and Bajor’s recovery from its Nazi-esque occupation are pivotal, to say nothing of the intense, ambiguous moral complexity of the series’ central antagonist Gul Dukat (Marc Alaimo) which is one of the best portrayals of rounded villainy ever seen on television. From narcissistic Hitlerian charmer and analogous Nazi oppressor to religious zealot, Dukat tumbles down a character path that sees him stripped of rank, serving as an arrogant military leader and suffering as a bereaved father which, like Brooks’ Sisko, is only believable from Alaimo’s magnificent performance.

What is curious, particularly for those who watched earlier series from a young age, is just how multifaceted they really were. DS9’s contemporary, Star Trek: Voyager (VOY) was heavily action focussed and it offered a wonderful alternative to what seemed like the ceaseless talking of the other shows. The Voyager two-parter, ‘Year of Hell’, was a particularly shocking action-centric trial by fire for the crew which saw most of them die and Captain Janeway (Kate Mulgrew) add another, albeit impressive, on-screen death to the character’s list of demises. In retrospect, action ages and computer graphics date. Alternatively, if it’s done correctly, a taut script and innovative story has the potential to tap into eternal debates and resonate long after the episode has aired. By the time Voyager finished, Star Trek: Enterprise (‘ENT’, the first Trek show since TOS to be cancelled) had entirely forgotten this lesson and suffered the consequences of ignoring discussion and talking in favour of action sequences and violence.

What Star Trek needs to remember as it moves past its half-century celebration is that it will always succeed best when it aims to be the smartest show on TV. Viewers may now have an appetite for year-long arcs and hard-hitting, graphic storytelling, but the want for considerate science-fiction has not waned. The popularity of the reimagined Battlestar Galactica, helmed by Star Trek alumnus Ronald D. Moore, reminds us that science-fiction works best as a decontextualization of the issues which affect our shared humanity.

Episodic statements about interesting issues have longevity precisely because they can hit harder and faster in a more memorable way. That said, it’s the accumulative and empirical development which holds power and sway in today’s binge age and DS9, more than TOS, TNG, VOY or ENT, should be the model for the new show Star Trek: Discovery.

Star Trek does not die, but like its other great contemporary Doctor Who, it occasionally needs to take a break to find its bearings and to remember what makes it great.

Comments

Alastair Stewart 260 Articles

Alastair Stewart is a freelance writer and mentor. In 2013, Alastair founded DARROW, Scotland’s only dedicated forum for more than 200 up and coming writers. The magazine works predominantly with 16-35-year-olds to give them the tools they need to share their ideas, hone their craft and thrive as writers, journalists, and storytellers. He regularly writes about politics, history, and culture for magazines across Europe.

Be the first to comment

What do you think?